Case study / 05 · Behavioral Economics

Gambling & Loss Aversion

Do we make different bets after we feel like we’ve won or lost?

Behavioral Economics
UC San Diego · MGT 160
Experimental DesignQualtricsANOVAHypothesis TestingProspect Theory

The experiment

Our team designed a randomized online blackjack experiment to test whether gain or loss framing changes subsequent risk-taking. Each participant faced the same real betting task with a 100-chip starting bankroll, but the reference point varied: an imagined gain, an imagined loss, or no prior event.

Three randomized conditions

01
Gain framing

Participants were told they started with 50 chips and won 50, arriving at 100.

02
Loss framing

Participants were told they started with 150 chips and lost 50, arriving at 100.

03
Neutral control

Participants started directly with 100 chips. The first real bet was the primary behavioral outcome.

What happened

141Participants
77.5Average first bet · Gain
0.32ANOVA p-value
77.5
56.1
56.2
GainLossControl

The gain group placed larger first bets on average than the other two groups, but the differences were not statistically significant (reported F(2,138) = 1.14, p = 0.32). We therefore cannot conclude that the framing manipulation caused a change in betting behavior.

Limits and lessons

The gain and loss rounds were hypothetical, and the sample may have lacked power to detect smaller effects. The project reinforced how important it is to distinguish a visually interesting difference from a statistically supported finding.

Explore the work

Read the original project materials behind this case study.